![]() ![]() #SONGKONG HELP MANUAL#Otherwise, I will have to do a lot of manual tag editing after SongKong applies its changes to my classical material. I don’t know if there is a option to correct this or to have SongKong skip Genre=Classical or something like that. It also wipes out any soloists who might have been included in the Artist field originally. #SONGKONG HELP UPDATE#Also, it does not update any information for the Orchestra attribute (I don’t know if this is a standard attribute but I use it always in JRiver). The only downside I have seen is with Classical music where SongKong will change the artist from its current value which is usually Conducter/Orchestra to Composer. Again, I had to SSH into my NAS to fix this before SongKong could finish making changes. ![]() ![]() Second, for some reason, a number of my files had a read-only attribute set for the group and this prevented SongKong from making any changes. I had to SSH into my NAS to clean these up to prevent them from generating errors in SongKong. #SONGKONG HELP WINDOWS#One, the library on my NAS was littered with lots of trash from Windows and Apple systems, including. ![]() I ran into two issues that SomgKong discovered but were not its fault. I don’t use iTunes so I didn’t test that part. I purchased SongKong and ran it on my main music library. SongKong gets it right, works on any platform, and is the tagging fixer upper of choice. There are other programs like tuneup, MusicBrainz Picard – which also uses acoustic fingerprinting – or MP3 Tag, but I find all the others lacking in one way or another. Once found, all the metadata is added back to the track and voila! We have the name, the artist, everything we might wish. Like figuring out the identity of a criminal in a who-dunnit, acoustic fingerprinting makes a copy of the music and plays it into a database to locate a match. How, you might ask, does it figure out a track of music without any metadata? The process is rather amazing. Yes, a bit goofy of a name and the website’s not much to write home about, but it is a rather brilliant piece of work. This was some time ago and now that program has been updated and improved and it is still the best $32 a person with a library can spend. This amazing program not only identified 100% of every unidentified track I owned, it also found duplicates, fixed names, years, and provided better cover art than I had. How is it that I found out the name? I ran it through a program that fixed much of my library. It was Buddy Holly off an obscure album I had never heard of called Buddy Holly, From the original master tapes. No, I reasoned, it can’t be Costello because it sounds too much like Buddy Holly, yet…the recording quality sounded modern, much better than anything I associated with Holly. One particular track I swore must have been by Elvis Costello. It had all sorts of great music some I recognized, many others I did not. I received a demo disc from someone at a tradeshow. Or maybe a few duplicates, or some without cover art. And yet, there’s still unknown tracks and artists within my group of tunes. I have spent hours upon hours curating mine–grooming it to perfection. Without metadata we don’t know much of anything about a track of music.įew of our libraries are perfect. In short, metadata has all the information we need except one: the actual music itself. Metadata is digital audio’s underlying information of what tracks are what, the name of the performing artist, band, cover art, liner notes, sample rate, filter type, release year, track number, etc. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |